Tag: African Mobilities

  • Patti Anahory // cross-disciplinary contemplations about urban imaginaries

    Born on a ship on the way to São Tomé and Príncipe, Patti Anahory lived there for 7 years before being raised in Cabo Verde. She ventured off to the US to do her undergraduate and graduate degrees in architecture. Throughout her studies Anahory maintained a desire to locate her work and sites of inquiry in and about Africa. This was initially a challenge as her formal architecture education offered little flexibility with regards to the content that could be explored as a student. At the end of her undergraduate education at the Boston Architecture College she won a travelling scholarship that allowed her to spend a month in South Africa. She later went to Princeton University to complete her graduate studies and Anahory began to direct her academic pursuits towards the continent. Her thesis project focused on Dakar, Senegal.

    This required Anahory to present loaded justifications to demonstrate why African cities should be viewed as legitimate sites for research within architectural academic programs. Her persistence continued to motivate her until she was awarded the prestigious Rotch Traveling Scholarship in 2000 through a two-stage architecture design competition. From this she was able to visit cities in East and West Africa. This was a significant moment for her, as she was still on the search for thematics that were able to unpack social, cultural and geo-political understandings of African cities. It also presented her with the opportunity to affirm that African cities are legitimate sites of inquiry. Anahory explains the significance of this by stating that around 2000 there were only a few architects engaging with African cities from this vantage point, or at least few getting recognized for doing so. “So you start to see your work as a political act because it was so out of the mainstream ways of looking into architecture, and modes of knowledge production about architecture,” she explains.

    Reflecting on the attitudes of the scholarship committee for the competition Anahory shares that, “they just could not understand the production of space and architectural critical thinking as a contemporary issue in Africa.” Her choice to explore East and West African countries allowed for a moment of rupture from her formal architectural education which did not place any emphasis on the contemporary conditions of the African city. After over a year of travelling she had to return to New York and worked as a freelance architect. A few years later her home country called her back.

    She was offered the opportunity to help setup a multidisciplinary research centre at Cabo Verde’s first public university. This presented an exciting challenge to setup an agenda for the relevant issues relating to the Cabo Verde built environment. This was a joint effort with her colleague Andreia Moassab at the centre with whom she shared similar interests in postcolonial studies, decolonising knowledge within the field of architecture as well as an exploration of how to think about development strategies and appropriate paradigms.

    While serving as director at the research centre, Anahory co-founded an art collective called XU:Collective with Andreia, who was  research coordinator, and Salif Diallo Silva, who was responsible for the research group on design and territory. “We decided we want to create a parallel practice that would allow us more freedom and a different language from scientific research and academic institutionalized setting, to speak about things such as environmental and social justice. Things we were addressing at the university but in a different way. In many ways the university and the collective informed each other,” she explains. An artistic language also allowed a different way to engage with society and to reach a larger public.

    When responding to my question about her views on architecture, urban planning and development on the continent, she expressed that rethinking new paradigms on all levels is important. This also involves how we can contribute more to cities and more sustainable development. “We also need to think and speculate about what future we want, and what kind of theoretical basis we want to produce. There are those of us carefully thinking about what kind of practice we want. Architecture is not only about producing buildings and objects, but also about critically thinking about our contemporary moment,” she explains.

    Due to this Anahory, like many others, has to take on multiple roles to tackle the double burden of contributing to an intellectual discourse while presenting a shift in what is seen as knowledge and how it is produced. “You have to be acting in so many realms in order to feel like you are making a change or contributing towards something,” she expresses.

    Working on curating her independent practice, Anahory continues to invest in urban activism and advocacy.  “I can only try to contribute to a more just city. And our cities and our models for development are very much imported from outside an in a neoliberal logic.” This is done through projects with young urban activists, specifically in neighbourhoods that have been neglected in terms of physical and social infrastructure.

    Considering that African Mobilities is a platform that offers multiple avenues for contemplating city-ness and all its associates (identity, culture, physical and social infrastructure, etc.), the inclusion of Anahory in the Praia Exchange made sense considering her experience in having to justify the exploration of contemporary Africa outside of the framework set out by western epistemological agendas.

    From the get go the participants bonded over questioning the terminology of “Lusophone” Africa, (as with “Francophone” and “Anglophone”) and the imaginaries they invoke. Anahory, speaking from an island perspective, and highlighting the ambiguous relationship Cabo Verde has with the rest of the continent, was able to present how our collective imaginaries from these labels craft our identities and place us closer or further apart. Drawing on the parallels between Luanda and Praia, cross-disciplinary investigations and conversations opened up new questions and debates.

    Anahory will be coming to South Africa again this year as a visiting research fellow at University of Johannesburg. Perhaps the Praia Exchange has offered a point of departure for the time she will spend here.

  • Investigating the Diasporic Condition through Architecture // Emanuel Admassu

    Emanuel Admassu was born in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and is a founding partner of the AD-WO design practice based between Brooklyn and Providence together with Jen Wood. With over five years of teaching experience in multiple programs at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation as well as at Rhode Island School of Design, Admassu has a resilient commitment to research. His recent body of work examined the constructed identities of urban markets in East Africa. Admassu is involved in the investigation of prospects and difficulties associated with the diasporic condition that is implemented through his research, teaching and design practice. In my interview with Admassu he tells me more about his background, research, as well as his involvement in African Mobilities.

    Can you tell me more about your design practice, AD-WO?

    We have been working on projects of various scales positioned throughout the world. A lot of it is driven by our discipline’s need to negotiate between radically different sensibilities. We are currently working on several projects in Ethiopia, that requires a lot of traveling and collaboration with local practices, cultures, building techniques and zoning codes. This forces us to develop different ways of communicating and materializing our ideas, and also challenges us to constantly learn from these contexts in order to develop a more ethical practice that works against the legacy of our discipline as an extension of imperialism.

    We are interested in understanding architecture as the difference between its content and container. Therefore, for each project we have to carefully define what to absorb from the cultural and physical context and also what to introduce into that context.

    You are engaged with investigating the opportunities and problems associated with the diasporic condition through your research, teaching and design practice, have come to any conclusions on the topic thus far?

    I moved to the US as a teenager, and have been oscillating back and forth between my identity as an Ethiopian immigrant living in the US and an American citizen visiting Ethiopia. This instability has been highly productive for my research and design practices. I am part of a growing number of African immigrants living elsewhere, while focusing on African issues through their creative production.

    This diasporic condition is creating interesting types of artists and designers who are able to consistently question and challenge how the continent is represented. This issue of mobility is not unique to Africans. I teach at a private institution in North America, where the student body is made up of a growing number of international students. Therefore, this idea of designing and thinking from afar is an integral part of my pedagogy. These are students who are being trained in the Western context with hopes of contributing to their places of origin.

    Photography by Elad Sarig, Tel Aviv Museum of Art

    What kind of conversations are taking place in your region relating to urban planning and architecture?

    There are lots of debates about what it means to be a global architect today. We are currently experiencing an intensifying level of volatility, ranging from the wealth disparities in the global south, to the unapologetic bigotry that led to Trump, Brexit, etc. We have to develop strategies to resist and compromise these contemporary forms of tribalism.

    Architecture is a civic project that provides platforms for the negotiation of differences. Nevertheless, the expansion of neoliberalism is making it difficult to design genuinely public buildings. Some architects are trying to do this through speculative, self-initiated projects, while others are venturing into the realm of design/build by establishing non-profit organizations. Since we are such a young practice, we have the luxury of experimenting with all of these models.

    Do you have any new critiques on it?

    My critique is against the tendency for architectural discourse to solely operate from the realm of criticism. The projective aspects of our discipline are being left behind as architects are increasingly seduced with the production of knowledge as the only way to act politically.

    There is an honest commitment towards a heightened sense of environmental awareness. Although I am a big fan of these approaches, we are also interested in the more traditional ways of practicing architecture by analyzing and designing new spatial conditions.

    I believe the lack of agency that is currently being experienced by architects is forcing them to undermine the power of our discipline: namely our ability to manipulate physical space. It is important to operate simultaneously through design and analysis. We are interested in the production of buildings just as much as we are interested in the production of books, lectures, and exhibitions.

    How are these conversations imagining future cities?

    We are fundamentally interested in exploring the ways in which architecture can move past the developer paradigm and begin to design new forms of communality. The typological research we are doing with urban markets is driven by an ambition to identify urban formations that resonate across different political, cultural and economic contexts. It is also driven by an interest in exploring different forms of representation. We have to invent new ways of drawing and talking about cities if we really want to capture the dynamism of contemporary cities in Africa.

    Exhibition and gallery talk for Material as Social Construct as Material (MaSCaM) exhibition

    What kind of schools of thought do you follow in relation to imaging cities?

    I think we need to learn from other creative disciplines when it comes to imaging cities. The slowness of our discipline forces us to always play catchup when it comes to means of representation. But that lag also leaves ample time for selective sampling and translation. This is why we have been keen to collaborate with other visual artists.

    I am currently working on a project with an art historian, Anita Bateman, called Where is Africa? by and large, it is an extended set of conversations (through interviews and upcoming symposia) with contemporary artists who are actively engaged in representing the continent of Africa both within and outside its geographic boundaries. It has been inspiring to discover how these painters, photographers, curators, and academics are using their respective disciplines to grapple with the uncertainties of the present moment.

    Do you feel like having younger voices added to these conversations is having a positive impact and if so please explain?

    Absolutely. It’s always interesting to think about generational shifts. I enjoy having conversations with my nephews (they’re both teenagers), just to understand their cultural reference points. They have a radically different relationship with images than I do, because a large chunk of their social life happens online. The growing influence of the digital realm is somewhat disconcerting to a discipline that typically develops drawings, images and text with hopes of eventually resulting in a physical intervention. Regardless, I also think this shift opens up new opportunities to not only engage with the physical object but to also design the ways it is being mediated, disseminated, and experienced in digital space.

    How do you feel about being a part of African Mobilities?

    It was really refreshing to participate in an international event about African cities that centers African students’ interests and interpretations. It is an intelligent model for cultivating a Pan-African conversation about design and urbanism. It was also rewarding to observe what the students and artists appreciated about the city and the market.

    From the outset, it was clear that the project was designed with an awareness of the asymmetries and pitfalls associated with projects that attempt to make Africa knowable to a Western audience. The format, the premise, and the participants of African Mobilities were selected to eschew typical, myopic interpretations and clichés. Workshops followed by a series of lectures on architecture, photography, and painting allowed us to have complex and difficult conversations about disciplinary boundaries and ethical concerns. I am looking forward to the exhibition and publication!

    Below is an excerpt from animation by Ezra Wube of an on-going research project by AD–WO.

     

  • Exploring the place of social justice and sustainability in urban planning and design

    OluTimehin Adegbeye is a Nigerian speaker, writer, and activist. Her work is derived from a self-perceived duty to social justice with a focus on gender, class, sexualities and sexual violence. Other concerns addressed in her work are Sustainable Development and Urban Poverty.

    When asked about her career path, OluTimehin expresses “I don’t know that I ‘chose’ to follow this career path; I speak and think about problems that seem to me to be pressing and in need of urgent engagement. In the course of that, opportunities present themselves, and I take those which help me inspire more people to engage with our societies’ many ailments where gender, class and other sites of marginalisation are concerned.”

    OluTimehin gave her first TED Talk titled “White Sands, White Flags: The Demolition of Lagos State Waterfront Communities” at TEDLagos Ideas Search in February of this year. Her second TED Talk titled “Who Belongs in a City?” was held at TEDGlobal in Arusha, Tanzania. She was also a speaker on several panels that include “Rewriting Herstory: Harnessing the Power of Feminist Writing Platforms and Networks at the Black Feminisms/AWID Forum” (Brazil, 2016), “Spirit Women at ChaleWote: Spirit Robot” (Ghana, 2016) as well as “Intersections: Culture, Social Justice and Feminist Narratives” (Ghana, 2016).

    Her writing has been published in multiple languages and can be found in StyleMANIA Magazine (Nigeria), Klassekampen (Norway), Women’s Asia 21 (Japan) and Essays Magazine (South Africa) to name a few. Online, her writing has become part of the content in the African Women’s Development Fund, the Association for Women’s Rights in Development, and the African Feminist Forum, along with other platforms. Besides what has already been mentioned, OluTimehin is an alumna of the Farafina Trust Creative Writing Workshop (Nigeria, 2015), the inaugural Writing for Social Justice workshop organised by AWDF in collaboration with FEMRITE (Uganda, 2014) and the Farafina and the BRITDOC Queer Impact Producers Lab (USA, 2017). The list of her written output continues to get longer, emphasizing her determination to address the social justices issues mentioned earlier.

    OluTimehin’s personal writing consists of memoir writing, autofiction, and poetry that explore motifs such as solidarity, autonomy, trauma, motherhood and radical love. Working towards the deconstruction of exploitative and aggressive power structures fortifying globalised societies, she aspires to re-inscribe the core value of human life.

    “I started to identify as a feminist in 2013 and since then I have benefited from and continue to contribute to many physical and digital communities that share stories and strategies about how to make our realities less violently exclusionary. I began engaging with questions of urban development about a year ago, and since then I’ve had opportunities to share my perspective on what an inclusive vision of my home city, Lagos, might be.”

    OluTimehin forms a part of African Mobilities‘ Friday Lecture series and shares the following thoughts on her involvement, “I think it was very discerning of the organisers in Lagos to think about not just the physical landscape, but also the social aspects of how the city functions, and thus to invite someone like me who doesn’t work in the traditional design space to speak to the impacts design, urban vision and ‘development’ might have on the populations of my city. I’m honoured to have been invited to add this perspective to the layers of discourse around African Mobilities.”

    Identifying as a decolonial feminist, OluTimehin is currently based in Lagos, and is actively working towards unravelling societal dilemmas from this viewpoint.